As we have documented in several articles and examples in our database in the past, Moscow keeps trying to create tension and sabotage Moldova’s European trajectory.
Most coverage in pro-Kremlin outlets was devoted to Moldova’s referendum on changing the constitution to mention its European aspirations. The most popular narratives concerned allegations of widespread electoral fraud committed by President Sandu’s administration to swing the vote its way. At the same time, disinformation outlets also focussed on the presidential elections, alleging the government was cracking down on the opposition and opposition media.
These are classic Moscow tropes, which can be observed in connection with many elections across the EU or in other countries not toeing Russian policy. See, for example, our series on Moscow’s coverage of the European Parliament elections. Claims centre on pushing two narratives: ‘the elites vs. the people’ and ‘lost sovereignty’. An illustrative example from RT in German claims that last weekend’s election was a ‘creeping coup d’état towards a one-party state’.
The Kremlin’s claims have been broadcast across most language platforms to reach global audiences with the purpose of smearing Sandu and the EU.
One may ask: if, supposedly, it was so rigged, why did the referendum and the presidential election not produce results preferred by President Sandu and the government? We know how things are in Russia where most election results are portrayed as showing more than 80 per cent of support for the regime.
All this is contrasted by the preliminary findings and conclusions of the OSCE’s International Election Observation Mission, which concluded that both votes were well managed and highlighted that ‘[c]ontestants campaigned freely in an environment characterised by concerns over illicit foreign interference and active disinformation efforts.’ The last phrase is shorthand for interference from Russia and its proxies.
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova claimed that the presidential elections were conducted by Moldovan authorities ‘employing anti-democratic, totalitarian methods’. Zakharova denied accusations that Russia interfered in Moldova’s affairs and attempted to influence the elections. Zakharova advanced her claims with determination, suggesting she was admitting Moscow’s obvious hand.
A rule of thumb: never trust anything until Moscow has denied it.
Gearing up for the second round in Moldova on 3 November
Moscow is frustrated that years of pressure have not managed to secure domination over Moldova, but the campaign goes on. The Kremlin uses Moldova as a test bed for modern techniques of manipulation. All tricks are tried out: pressure via economic measures, especially an energy cut-off; an attempted coup in 2023; and the massive spread of false content (see our database) including AI-generated videos misusing Sandu’s image. In addition, Kremlin proxies planned fake demonstrations and unrest, and oligarchs like Ilan Shor, a refugee, in Moscow is accused of buying votes at a massive scale.
Everything points to Moscow wanting to turn up the interference and wedge-driving against Sandu in coming weeks leading up to the second round of the presidential election in Moldova on 3 November.
Turning to Ukraine: who owns the peace narrative?
The Kremlin’s talk about supposed peace and the future of Ukraine present another example of a creeping manipulation of the information space in order to appropriate or dominate it. The key to understanding the slippery slope of the Kremlin’s deceptive lingo is to recall what was said earlier and how Moscow tries to divert attention to other topics.
This week’s statement from Russian UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya was about Ukraine’s membership in NATO: ‘Ukraine’s membership in NATO in any territorial layout is absolutely unacceptable for Russia and cannot be part of any peace plans or mediatory initiatives’. It seeks to give Russia an a priori right to define what can and cannot be discussed.
This manipulation of the information space by carving out pieces is another classic Kremlin tactic also noted in connection with the Russian-occupied Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia. The deceptive wording goes, ‘These are closed questions, they are regions of the Russian Federation’. The sugar-coated version, also aimed at third countries around the world, goes, ‘Everybody should accept the realities on the ground’. Who wouldn’t want to be in touch with realities? Who would want to live with their head in the clouds?
Note carefully Moscow’s selective approach. Russian leaders often claim in highbrow speeches that ‘every country is free to choose’ and ‘Russia does not interfere’. A disinformation reality check proves otherwise. Moscow is hell-bent on controlling its neighbours and others beyond.
Article and pictures first time published on the EUvsDisinfo web page. Prepared for publication by volunteers from the Res Publica - The Center for Civil Resistance.
